Subloading1D
The Modified Extended Subloading Surface (Hashiguchi) Model
The subloading surface framework provides a very versatile approach to model cyclic behaviour. It is highly recommended to try it out.
References
The implementation is based on the following paper.
Additional material on the same topic can be found in the following literature.
Prof. Koichi Hashiguchi has published a large amount of papers on this topic. To find more references, please refer to the monograph and the references therein.
Alternatively, refer to the corresponding section in Constitutive Modelling Cookbook for implementation details.
Theory
Subloading Surface
The subloading surface is defined as
where η=σ−ayα+(z−1)σyd is the shifted stress, shifted from the centre defined by ayα+(1−z)σyd. The scalar 0⩽z⩽1 is the normal yield ratio that provides a smooth transition from the interior to the normal yield surface. The scalar σy is the yield stress, that is affected by isotropic hardening.
Isotropic Hardening
The isotropic hardening combines linear hardening and exponential saturation.
where σi is the initial yield stress, kiso is the linear hardening modulus, σisos is the saturation stress and misos is the hardening rate.
The history variable q is the accumulated plastic strain, conventionally, it is
where γ is the plasticity multiplier.
Kinematic Hardening
A modified Armstrong--Frederick rule is adopted for the normalised back stress α.
with
where b is hardening rate. Compared to the conventional AF rule, the saturation bound is not a constant in this model. Instead, it is associated to plasticity. The backbone ay mimics σy. The parameters ai, kkin, akins and mkins share similar implications compared to their counterparts.
Evolution of z
The following rule is used. Noting that the original formulation uses a cotangent function. Here, the logarithmic function is used instead. Also, the original formulation sets a minimum value for z (R in the references). We do not adopt such a limit.
In which, u is a constant that controls the rate of transition.
Evolution of d
The evolution of d resembles that of α.
in which ce and ze<1 are two constants.
Syntax
History Layout
initial_history(0)
iteration counter
initial_history(1)
accumulated plastic strain q
initial_history(2)
normal yield ratio z
initial_history(3)
normalised back stress α
initial_history(4)
normalised elastic core d
Example
See this example.
Accuracy
Last updated